The GTP selection / application process continues with unrelenting rigour. Revisiting Northampton proved to be a more relaxed experience for a couple of reasons. One of the key differences is that they removed the, somewhat synthetic, literacy lesson delivery and replaced it with a more practical science presentation. The lucky few (60 out of 400 applicants) will be invited back for the second interview phase where live pupils will be released for general instruction. Of this 60 only 30 will be offered a place (7.5%).
The second difference that I noted was in the interview itself which was specifically designed to glean ones level of subject knowledge (core curriculum subjects). This was much more transparent than my last experience which was geared more towards one’s general knowledge of education as a whole – much more cloak and dagger and without clear parameters.
The numeracy and Literacy tests were still there however a mental maths and spelling test were new additions. Nothing too taxing and the maths was at / just above year 6 level with lots of ratio, proportion and % age. The essay was a bit wooly “Why I want to be a teacher.”
Overall I would say that being relaxed and yourself is the key. Easier said than done in some cases though eh!
Interesting to see that there are 400 applicants for only 30 places – and a little alarming that with such competition there still seems to be a need to test literacy and numeracy. It would seem more straightforward to only interview those who already had the qualifications in Maths, English and whatever else is currently required for teachers. The interviews could then focus on selecting from those with all the required qualifications, with more interesting (and relevant) tasks.
Isn’t it funny what we readily accept as the norm in power imbalanced (perceived and actual) scenarios. Now that you have stated the obvious Shirley it is obvious isn’t it. It would give selectors a further 40 minutes to probe deeper which in turn would offer more opportunity for individuals to shine. Once I have secured my place I will feed this back. :0)
I agree totally, qualifications should establish that subject competence exists, why they need to see if you can pass year 6 maths is beyond my comprehension. Far better for them to spend time establishing who you are – an essay on why I want to be a teacher also seems a very basic way of achieving insight. A verbal discussion on your approach to teaching might be more relevant. Very best wishes with the application Julian.